Built-in Quality
Anyone who has worked in operations, whether in manufacturing or service processes, knows this fundamental truth: quality is not guaranteed by inspections at the end of the line. It must be built upstream, at the source, directly within the process itself. In Lean Manufacturing, and particularly through the lens of Value Stream Mapping (VSM), this principle is essential to eliminate waste, increase reliability, and create a smoother, faster flow.
The traditional approach to quality control is based on final inspection: checking whether a product is compliant or not. The problem is that the Issues are often discovered too late, or worse, not at all. By then, the damage is done: rework, scrap, material accumulation, delivery delays, increased costs, and, in the worst cases, dissatisfied customers.
[Important side note: if you're struggling with your own value stream, download our free trial here and request a complimentary web meeting with one of our experts here. No need to go it alone! More than a quarter of the Fortune 500 companies already use eVSM for their value stream mapping, and it's affordable for smaller entities too.]
One of the most critical aspects of a VSM project is analyzing where quality controls are placed in the process. Are they located downstream? Are they in the right places? Are they proactive or reactive? The ideal scenario is to eliminate, or drastically reduce, the need for end-of-line inspections. On the Value Stream Map, this translates into the removal of non–value-added steps such as final inspections, rework, or scrap accumulation. The flow becomes more linear, more fluid and, most importantly, driven by value, not waste.
Value stream mapping: remove non-value-added steps
In a recent project within a company that manufacturing components for the industrial and agricultural sectors, I had the opportunity to lead a transformation initiative grounded in these very principles. The company followed traditional processes (cutting, bending, welding, machining, painting, and assembly), and despite solid technical expertise, they were registering more than 140 customer non-conformity reports annually, with scrap levels exceeding 1,500 ppm and non-quality costs estimated at over 2% of annual revenue.
We mapped the flow of operations and information and the relations throughout the organization: The organizational structure was conventional: the quality department handled final inspections, updated and verified control plans for each phase, and produced daily scrap reports. What was missing, however, was a fundamental principle: shared responsibility for quality.
We addressed this gap through four key interventions aimed at breaking down silos and embedding a culture of prevention and quality directly at the source of value creation:
- Organization: Quality technicians were integrated into the production teams. No longer a separate function, they became active participants in monitoring and prevention, supporting supervisors and operators in identifying the root causes of anomalies and implementing countermeasures in real time.
- Objectives: Production was assigned ownership of the "customer non-conformity" KPI, making them jointly accountable for final customer satisfaction.
- Methods: Each department introduced daily meetings dedicated to quality, supplemented by weekly problem-solving sessions focused on root cause analysis and standardized countermeasures. Additionally, a daily plant meeting ensured cross-functional alignment.
- Training: A structured training program was rolled out covering problem-solving techniques and analytical tools such as the 5 Whys, Ishikawa diagrams, process audits, and Poka-Yoke (error-proofing) methods.
Within six months of implementation, the following results were achieved:
- 50% reduction in customer non-conformities
- Elimination of final quality control as a process phase
- Shorter lead times due to the removal of rework buffers
- Higher productivity per square meter, having freed up space previously occupied by scrap and rework areas
But above all, the most meaningful shift was cultural. Operators now see quality, live it, and feel ownership of it. They collaborate in workstation design, propose improvements to strengthen the process, and suggest design changes to standardize components or make them mistake-proof.
Quality is a Shared Responsibility
The most valuable lesson is that Quality is not a department, it is a way of working. It means designing processes (or better components and products) that prevent errors from happening, or at the very least, detect them as early as possible. It means training people, fostering a strong quality culture, and designing materials and equipment to support correct work from the start.
Where quality is built into the process, final inspections become mere formalities. Customer trust is no longer a fragile achievement; it becomes a structural certainty.
Download a free trial of our eVSM software and request a web meeting with one of our Lean experts. It can save you hours or even days of time, and most of our clients save the cost of the software while still on the free trial.